Report vs Essay
Report and Essay are two words used by the common man with almost the same sense. Strictly speaking the sense differs when it comes to the understanding of the purport of the two words.
A report is a summary of an event to be precise. On the other hand an essay is a description of a historical event or a character of a person. Mass communication forms the basis of report writing. On the other hand essay literature forms the basis of essay. In other words it can be said that journalism is the source for writing a report. Literature is the source for writing an essay.
You can write an essay on the use of the figure of speech of metaphor by Shakespeare based on the literature available to you. You will take the help of the available literature to prepare or write the essay. On the other hand you will write a report of an event that took place based on the first hand information available to you. You would have witnessed the event yourself to write the report.
You might not have witnessed what you write in an essay. Hence an essay is said to have been derived from literature whereas report is said to have been derived from journalism or mass communication. Direct experience is involved in report whereas direct experience may not be involved in essay. Poetical expressions are needed in the writing of an essay whereas imagery is not needed in the writing of a report.
In other words it can be said that you will have to be creative while writing an essay. You will have to be descriptive while writing a report. An essay is a literary form whereas a report is a form of journalism. Essays form part of literature whereas reports do not form part of literature.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-report-and-vs-essay/#ixzz1NEoECzHd
Pengetahuan manusia hanya setetes air di samudera, maka jangan lah berhenti berfikir, cari kebenaran, temukan yang lebih baik, kritisi fikiran sendiri. Selalu buka mata dan kepala ! Jangan gelar DOKTOR dan PROFESOR mengkerangkeng Anda.
Senin, 23 Mei 2011
Kesuksesan vs Kegagalan
Success vs Failure
Success and Failure are two words in the English language that differ in their meanings by a great degree. In fact they are treated as opposites. Success consists in the achievement or the realization of one’s goal.
Failure on the other hand consists in the non-achievement or the non-realization of one’s goal. Success brings happiness whereas failure brings about sorrow.
It is generally said that failures are the stepping stones for success. Success is normally the result of hard work. On the other hand failure is the result of lack of hard work and perseverance.
Success will make one active and charged. On the other hand failure would make one dull and struck with remorse. Success results from concentration whereas failure results from lack of concentration.
Success results in honor whereas failure results in insult. This only shows the fact that success and honor are associated with each other. On the other hand failure and insult are associated with each other.
Philosophers give a solution to the handling of the two states success and failure. They would say that a man of resolute would take both success and failure alike. He is neither overwhelmed by success nor bothered to a great extent by failure. He would do well to have a philosophical perspective while understanding the two terms success and failure.
It is easy to take success in your stride whereas it is very difficult to take failure in your stride. This is because of the element of disappointment associated with failure. A successful man gets confidence whereas a man characterized by failures lacks confidence.
Success and failure are in fact two aspects of life that are not permanent. On the other hand they are two transitory states of mind that should be dealt with accordingly. They are two psychological states.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-success-and-failure/#ixzz1NEnRX5Su
Success and Failure are two words in the English language that differ in their meanings by a great degree. In fact they are treated as opposites. Success consists in the achievement or the realization of one’s goal.
Failure on the other hand consists in the non-achievement or the non-realization of one’s goal. Success brings happiness whereas failure brings about sorrow.
It is generally said that failures are the stepping stones for success. Success is normally the result of hard work. On the other hand failure is the result of lack of hard work and perseverance.
Success will make one active and charged. On the other hand failure would make one dull and struck with remorse. Success results from concentration whereas failure results from lack of concentration.
Success results in honor whereas failure results in insult. This only shows the fact that success and honor are associated with each other. On the other hand failure and insult are associated with each other.
Philosophers give a solution to the handling of the two states success and failure. They would say that a man of resolute would take both success and failure alike. He is neither overwhelmed by success nor bothered to a great extent by failure. He would do well to have a philosophical perspective while understanding the two terms success and failure.
It is easy to take success in your stride whereas it is very difficult to take failure in your stride. This is because of the element of disappointment associated with failure. A successful man gets confidence whereas a man characterized by failures lacks confidence.
Success and failure are in fact two aspects of life that are not permanent. On the other hand they are two transitory states of mind that should be dealt with accordingly. They are two psychological states.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-success-and-failure/#ixzz1NEnRX5Su
Kesuksesan vs Pencapaian
Success vs Achievement
Success and Achievement are two words that appear alike in their meanings, but strictly speaking they show some differences between them. The word ‘achievement’ is used in connection with the realization of one’s goals.
On the other hand the word success is used in the sense of fulfilling certain conditions necessary to reach the goal.
In other words it can be said that success leads to achievement. It can also be said that achievement is arrived at by string of successes. You achieve a goal by attaining success all the way. You don’t achieve a goal when you do not attain success. Thus it is said that success and achievement are related.
Success consists in succeeding in the attempt. Achievement consists in reaching a milestone. Scaling Mt. Everest is an achievement since it consists in reaching a milestone. In the same way setting foot on the moon is an achievement since it consists in reaching a milestone too.
Scoring distinction in the examination is an achievement. On the other hand clearing the examination paper in the first attempt can be called in terms of success. Finding a combination in the chemistry laboratory can be called in terms of success. It is not an achievement.
Success makes one happy whereas achievement makes one proud. In other words success is a matter of happiness whereas achievement is a matter of pride. If a country wins the football title in the world football championship, then the country is pride of its achievement. Winning every match is explained in terms of success. This is the basic difference between the two words success and achievement.
It is very important to note that success paves the way for achievement. Strings of successes would lead to achievement. This is the secret of achievement. Sometimes both these words are interchanged.
Achievement is used in connection with the realization of one’s goals.
Success is used in the sense of fulfilling certain conditions necessary to reach the goal.
Achievement is arrived at by string of successes
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-success-and-achievement/#ixzz1NEn6CzKj
Success and Achievement are two words that appear alike in their meanings, but strictly speaking they show some differences between them. The word ‘achievement’ is used in connection with the realization of one’s goals.
On the other hand the word success is used in the sense of fulfilling certain conditions necessary to reach the goal.
In other words it can be said that success leads to achievement. It can also be said that achievement is arrived at by string of successes. You achieve a goal by attaining success all the way. You don’t achieve a goal when you do not attain success. Thus it is said that success and achievement are related.
Success consists in succeeding in the attempt. Achievement consists in reaching a milestone. Scaling Mt. Everest is an achievement since it consists in reaching a milestone. In the same way setting foot on the moon is an achievement since it consists in reaching a milestone too.
Scoring distinction in the examination is an achievement. On the other hand clearing the examination paper in the first attempt can be called in terms of success. Finding a combination in the chemistry laboratory can be called in terms of success. It is not an achievement.
Success makes one happy whereas achievement makes one proud. In other words success is a matter of happiness whereas achievement is a matter of pride. If a country wins the football title in the world football championship, then the country is pride of its achievement. Winning every match is explained in terms of success. This is the basic difference between the two words success and achievement.
It is very important to note that success paves the way for achievement. Strings of successes would lead to achievement. This is the secret of achievement. Sometimes both these words are interchanged.
Achievement is used in connection with the realization of one’s goals.
Success is used in the sense of fulfilling certain conditions necessary to reach the goal.
Achievement is arrived at by string of successes
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-success-and-achievement/#ixzz1NEn6CzKj
Ilmu vs teknologi
Science vs Technology
Science can be called a systematic knowledge base developed through observation and experiment of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world; Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes.
Science and Technology might appear same when it comes to their meaning and purpose, but there is certainly some difference between the two. Science is normally spoken in connection with technology in the educational institutions. There is a difference in the definitions of the two.
Science is about the systematic arrival of conclusion or findings. It involves steps that establish the outcome of the findings. In short science can be called a systematic knowledge base. Technology on the contrary is applied science. Technology involves the use of tools as well as knowledge for the study of a particular science. Hence the term applied science is used to refer technology.
Science is a study of aspects under the various branches such as physics, chemistry and biology. In the case of technology, the science of radiation can be applied in the technology related to the development of the tools and advanced study of the application of radiation. As a result a radiation technician works with the technology of radiation have studied the science of radiation.
In the same way, the advancement in the study of energy led to the development of technology of solar panels that are used to generate energy and power. Thus the application of a particular branch of science is helpful in the development of technology of the particular branch. Thus technology can be called applied science.
Science is more concerned about analysis. Technology has everything to do with synthesis of design. Science deals with theories and their findings, whereas technology is much concerned about processes. Technology has to get its processes right to make an advancement in the field of applied science.
Another importance difference between science and technology is the fact that science involves observation and experimentation while technology is all about invention and production. The invention of tools and their production are the facets of technology.
Recap:
The difference between science and technology:
Science is more or less a study of a particular branch namely, physics, chemistry or biology. Technology deals with what is called applied science.
Science involves observation and experimentation whereas technology involves invention and production.
Science is all about analysis whereas technology is more concerned about the synthesis of design
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-science-and-technology/#ixzz1NEmox5KI
Science can be called a systematic knowledge base developed through observation and experiment of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world; Technology is the application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes.
Science and Technology might appear same when it comes to their meaning and purpose, but there is certainly some difference between the two. Science is normally spoken in connection with technology in the educational institutions. There is a difference in the definitions of the two.
Science is about the systematic arrival of conclusion or findings. It involves steps that establish the outcome of the findings. In short science can be called a systematic knowledge base. Technology on the contrary is applied science. Technology involves the use of tools as well as knowledge for the study of a particular science. Hence the term applied science is used to refer technology.
Science is a study of aspects under the various branches such as physics, chemistry and biology. In the case of technology, the science of radiation can be applied in the technology related to the development of the tools and advanced study of the application of radiation. As a result a radiation technician works with the technology of radiation have studied the science of radiation.
In the same way, the advancement in the study of energy led to the development of technology of solar panels that are used to generate energy and power. Thus the application of a particular branch of science is helpful in the development of technology of the particular branch. Thus technology can be called applied science.
Science is more concerned about analysis. Technology has everything to do with synthesis of design. Science deals with theories and their findings, whereas technology is much concerned about processes. Technology has to get its processes right to make an advancement in the field of applied science.
Another importance difference between science and technology is the fact that science involves observation and experimentation while technology is all about invention and production. The invention of tools and their production are the facets of technology.
Recap:
The difference between science and technology:
Science is more or less a study of a particular branch namely, physics, chemistry or biology. Technology deals with what is called applied science.
Science involves observation and experimentation whereas technology involves invention and production.
Science is all about analysis whereas technology is more concerned about the synthesis of design
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-science-and-technology/#ixzz1NEmox5KI
Organisasi vs perusahaan
Organization vs Firm
Organization and Firm are two words that are often confused in terms of their connotations. They appear to have similar functions, but strictly speaking they differ in their connotation and functions.
The manner in which an organization and a firm are structured is the basis of difference between them. A firm is said to have more than one partner that go in agreement between them. On the other hand an organization is a social arrangement characterized by collective goals and it looks upon its own performance.
There are varieties of firms such as law firm and business firm. On the other hand there are several types of organizations as well including non-governmental organizations, international organizations, not-for-profit corporations, cooperatives, partnerships, corporations and the like.
The basic difference between organization and firm is that organization focuses on the achievement of the goals of a company. Organization lies in creating value for stockholders, customers, employees, suppliers and community.
Partners work together bound by some kind of agreement between them in a firm. They work together characterized by organizational behavior in order to bring about results and goals of their company.
Firm and organization differ in terms of their leadership too. The leader in a firm is different from the leader in an organization in the sense that a leader in an organization is appointed to a managerial position and has the right to command, enforce obedience and behavior by force of the authority of his position.
On the other hand a leader in a firm is the sole partner or the partners singly. If the number of partners is more than one then it is true that they all share the position in enforcing obedience and behavior. This is one of the main differences between a firm and an organization.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-organization-and-vs-firm/#ixzz1NEmVwJHB
Organization and Firm are two words that are often confused in terms of their connotations. They appear to have similar functions, but strictly speaking they differ in their connotation and functions.
The manner in which an organization and a firm are structured is the basis of difference between them. A firm is said to have more than one partner that go in agreement between them. On the other hand an organization is a social arrangement characterized by collective goals and it looks upon its own performance.
There are varieties of firms such as law firm and business firm. On the other hand there are several types of organizations as well including non-governmental organizations, international organizations, not-for-profit corporations, cooperatives, partnerships, corporations and the like.
The basic difference between organization and firm is that organization focuses on the achievement of the goals of a company. Organization lies in creating value for stockholders, customers, employees, suppliers and community.
Partners work together bound by some kind of agreement between them in a firm. They work together characterized by organizational behavior in order to bring about results and goals of their company.
Firm and organization differ in terms of their leadership too. The leader in a firm is different from the leader in an organization in the sense that a leader in an organization is appointed to a managerial position and has the right to command, enforce obedience and behavior by force of the authority of his position.
On the other hand a leader in a firm is the sole partner or the partners singly. If the number of partners is more than one then it is true that they all share the position in enforcing obedience and behavior. This is one of the main differences between a firm and an organization.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-organization-and-vs-firm/#ixzz1NEmVwJHB
Feasibilitas vs Viabilitas
Feasibility vs Viability
Feasibility and viability are tools used in the investment appraisal of a project and its sustainability. Viability is the ability of a thing to maintain itself or get back its potentialities. Viability of a business is measured by means of the length of its survival. It is interesting to note that the sustainable profits the business had made over a period of time determine the viability of a business for that matter.
Feasibility consists in the evaluation of the aim of finding out the workability and the profitability of a business. It is quite normal that partners look into the feasibility of the business before investing money into the venture.
It is true that feasibility paves the way for viability as well. It all depends upon the profitability of a business to survive for lengthy periods of time amidst the tough competition. Feasibility is characterized by factors such as calculation, analysis and estimated projections among several other factors.
Viability on the other hand deals with business tactics and strategies to lengthen the life of the business. Strategies do not play a vital role in the concept of feasibility of a business whereas they do play a very important role in the concept of viability of business.
Business growth and sustainability are the two important aspects of viability. On the other hand feasibility is not concerned much about the aspects of business growth and sustainability. It is concerned only about the profitability and the workability of the business.
Feasibility of a business comes into play only after the particular business satisfies the conditions of profitability and workability. This means that viability follows feasibility. In other words feasibility paves the way for viability of a business.
Thus we come to know that men and material are required to achieve the goal of feasibility of a business. A feasible business is likely to last long and achieve viability too.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-feasibility-and-viability/#ixzz1NEm8lqKE
Feasibility and viability are tools used in the investment appraisal of a project and its sustainability. Viability is the ability of a thing to maintain itself or get back its potentialities. Viability of a business is measured by means of the length of its survival. It is interesting to note that the sustainable profits the business had made over a period of time determine the viability of a business for that matter.
Feasibility consists in the evaluation of the aim of finding out the workability and the profitability of a business. It is quite normal that partners look into the feasibility of the business before investing money into the venture.
It is true that feasibility paves the way for viability as well. It all depends upon the profitability of a business to survive for lengthy periods of time amidst the tough competition. Feasibility is characterized by factors such as calculation, analysis and estimated projections among several other factors.
Viability on the other hand deals with business tactics and strategies to lengthen the life of the business. Strategies do not play a vital role in the concept of feasibility of a business whereas they do play a very important role in the concept of viability of business.
Business growth and sustainability are the two important aspects of viability. On the other hand feasibility is not concerned much about the aspects of business growth and sustainability. It is concerned only about the profitability and the workability of the business.
Feasibility of a business comes into play only after the particular business satisfies the conditions of profitability and workability. This means that viability follows feasibility. In other words feasibility paves the way for viability of a business.
Thus we come to know that men and material are required to achieve the goal of feasibility of a business. A feasible business is likely to last long and achieve viability too.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-feasibility-and-viability/#ixzz1NEm8lqKE
Pembuatan keputusan vs pemecahan masalah
Decision Making vs Problem Solving
Decision Making and Problem Solving are two key management functions. It is customary to see the managers of companies to get involved in decision making and problem solving. Problem solving involves defining the problem. The problem is defined by asking a few questions such as ‘what causes you to think there is a problem?’ and ‘how is it happening?’
Consideration of the situation characterized by the absence of the problem is the crux of decision making. In other words if you begin to think about what will the situation look like when the problem is solved then you are into decision making. Hence decision making and problem solving are almost integrated.
Problem solving consists in looking at the potential causes of the problem. On the other hand decision making consists in the method of approaching to resolve the problem. You will have to involve in brainstorm to find out solutions to the problem in decision making. Lateral and creative thinking is important in good decision making.
Decision making in short can be called as the process of action plan. Action plan includes the calculation of the time needed to solve the problem. It also looks at the time needed for the implementation of the solution. It deals finally with the communication of the plan to all those involved in the implementation of the solution.
Problem solving consists in jotting down the description of the various causes of the problem in terms of question such as where, how, with whom and why. Decision making is all about finding solutions to all these questions such as how, where, with whom and why through the forming a plan that has to be implemented.
Problem solving itself is an experience to be undergone in every corporate establishment. Decision making on the other hand is the consideration of what have you learned from problem solving. Hence problem solving and decision making are integrated to a great extent.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-decision-making-and-problem-solving/#ixzz1NElnZo6d
Decision Making and Problem Solving are two key management functions. It is customary to see the managers of companies to get involved in decision making and problem solving. Problem solving involves defining the problem. The problem is defined by asking a few questions such as ‘what causes you to think there is a problem?’ and ‘how is it happening?’
Consideration of the situation characterized by the absence of the problem is the crux of decision making. In other words if you begin to think about what will the situation look like when the problem is solved then you are into decision making. Hence decision making and problem solving are almost integrated.
Problem solving consists in looking at the potential causes of the problem. On the other hand decision making consists in the method of approaching to resolve the problem. You will have to involve in brainstorm to find out solutions to the problem in decision making. Lateral and creative thinking is important in good decision making.
Decision making in short can be called as the process of action plan. Action plan includes the calculation of the time needed to solve the problem. It also looks at the time needed for the implementation of the solution. It deals finally with the communication of the plan to all those involved in the implementation of the solution.
Problem solving consists in jotting down the description of the various causes of the problem in terms of question such as where, how, with whom and why. Decision making is all about finding solutions to all these questions such as how, where, with whom and why through the forming a plan that has to be implemented.
Problem solving itself is an experience to be undergone in every corporate establishment. Decision making on the other hand is the consideration of what have you learned from problem solving. Hence problem solving and decision making are integrated to a great extent.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-decision-making-and-problem-solving/#ixzz1NElnZo6d
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)