Feasibility vs Viability
Feasibility and viability are tools used in the investment appraisal of a project and its sustainability. Viability is the ability of a thing to maintain itself or get back its potentialities. Viability of a business is measured by means of the length of its survival. It is interesting to note that the sustainable profits the business had made over a period of time determine the viability of a business for that matter.
Feasibility consists in the evaluation of the aim of finding out the workability and the profitability of a business. It is quite normal that partners look into the feasibility of the business before investing money into the venture.
It is true that feasibility paves the way for viability as well. It all depends upon the profitability of a business to survive for lengthy periods of time amidst the tough competition. Feasibility is characterized by factors such as calculation, analysis and estimated projections among several other factors.
Viability on the other hand deals with business tactics and strategies to lengthen the life of the business. Strategies do not play a vital role in the concept of feasibility of a business whereas they do play a very important role in the concept of viability of business.
Business growth and sustainability are the two important aspects of viability. On the other hand feasibility is not concerned much about the aspects of business growth and sustainability. It is concerned only about the profitability and the workability of the business.
Feasibility of a business comes into play only after the particular business satisfies the conditions of profitability and workability. This means that viability follows feasibility. In other words feasibility paves the way for viability of a business.
Thus we come to know that men and material are required to achieve the goal of feasibility of a business. A feasible business is likely to last long and achieve viability too.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-feasibility-and-viability/#ixzz1NEm8lqKE
Senin, 23 Mei 2011
Pembuatan keputusan vs pemecahan masalah
Decision Making vs Problem Solving
Decision Making and Problem Solving are two key management functions. It is customary to see the managers of companies to get involved in decision making and problem solving. Problem solving involves defining the problem. The problem is defined by asking a few questions such as ‘what causes you to think there is a problem?’ and ‘how is it happening?’
Consideration of the situation characterized by the absence of the problem is the crux of decision making. In other words if you begin to think about what will the situation look like when the problem is solved then you are into decision making. Hence decision making and problem solving are almost integrated.
Problem solving consists in looking at the potential causes of the problem. On the other hand decision making consists in the method of approaching to resolve the problem. You will have to involve in brainstorm to find out solutions to the problem in decision making. Lateral and creative thinking is important in good decision making.
Decision making in short can be called as the process of action plan. Action plan includes the calculation of the time needed to solve the problem. It also looks at the time needed for the implementation of the solution. It deals finally with the communication of the plan to all those involved in the implementation of the solution.
Problem solving consists in jotting down the description of the various causes of the problem in terms of question such as where, how, with whom and why. Decision making is all about finding solutions to all these questions such as how, where, with whom and why through the forming a plan that has to be implemented.
Problem solving itself is an experience to be undergone in every corporate establishment. Decision making on the other hand is the consideration of what have you learned from problem solving. Hence problem solving and decision making are integrated to a great extent.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-decision-making-and-problem-solving/#ixzz1NElnZo6d
Decision Making and Problem Solving are two key management functions. It is customary to see the managers of companies to get involved in decision making and problem solving. Problem solving involves defining the problem. The problem is defined by asking a few questions such as ‘what causes you to think there is a problem?’ and ‘how is it happening?’
Consideration of the situation characterized by the absence of the problem is the crux of decision making. In other words if you begin to think about what will the situation look like when the problem is solved then you are into decision making. Hence decision making and problem solving are almost integrated.
Problem solving consists in looking at the potential causes of the problem. On the other hand decision making consists in the method of approaching to resolve the problem. You will have to involve in brainstorm to find out solutions to the problem in decision making. Lateral and creative thinking is important in good decision making.
Decision making in short can be called as the process of action plan. Action plan includes the calculation of the time needed to solve the problem. It also looks at the time needed for the implementation of the solution. It deals finally with the communication of the plan to all those involved in the implementation of the solution.
Problem solving consists in jotting down the description of the various causes of the problem in terms of question such as where, how, with whom and why. Decision making is all about finding solutions to all these questions such as how, where, with whom and why through the forming a plan that has to be implemented.
Problem solving itself is an experience to be undergone in every corporate establishment. Decision making on the other hand is the consideration of what have you learned from problem solving. Hence problem solving and decision making are integrated to a great extent.
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-decision-making-and-problem-solving/#ixzz1NElnZo6d
Monitoring vs evaluasi
Monitoring vs Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation are two states of analysis in terms of the progress made in relation to the goals of an enterprise or a firm. These two states of analysis differ in their manner of approach. Monitoring is the systematic analysis made occasionally of information to identify changes over a period of time.
On the other hand evaluation is the analysis of the effectiveness of an activity that would finally prompt a judgment regarding the progress made in relation to the goals of a firm. This is the major difference between monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring keeps the track of the process of implementation. It consists in examining the progress made in a project against time by taking into account performance too. Evaluation on the other hand consists in estimating the value of something. It involves the process of finding the facts.
Evaluation can also be explained as the study of past experience when it comes to the performance and implementation of the project. Monitoring does not take into account the past experience involved in the performance of a project. In short it can be said that evaluation aims at the submission of the valid information on the conduct and impact of the project.
Evaluation consists in making a study about the effectiveness of the projects. On the other hand monitoring consists in periodical checking of progress made in the conduct of the projects against the targets and goals laid down. It has to be understood that monitoring is done with a view to ensure the completion of the project in time. This in fact is the very purpose of monitoring.
The purpose of monitoring also lies in providing constructive suggestions. These suggestions can be regarding the rescheduling of the project if required, allotment of separate budget to the project and even reassigning the staff for the conduct of a particular project.
On the other hand the purpose of evaluation lies in bringing about the process of accounting close to perfection. It also consists in making the best possible use of the available funds, methods to stop the probability of mistakes, testing the efficacy of the new techniques employed in the completion of the projects, verifying the real benefits of the projects and understanding the participation of the people in the project by means of surveys, interviews and the like. It is true that evaluation aims for the future
sumber:
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-monitoring-and-vs-evaluation/
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-monitoring-and-vs-evaluation/#ixzz1NEkZwMrs
Monitoring vs Evaluasi
Monitoring dan Evaluasi adalah dua bentuk analisis dalam hal kemajuan. Ini dibuat sehubungan dengan tujuan suatu perusahaan atau kegiatan. Kedua analisis ini berbeda dalam cara mereka mendekati objek atau masalah. Monitoring adalah analisis sistematis yang dijalankan secara reguler untuk mengidentifikasi perubahan selama jangka waktu tertentu.
Di sisi lain evaluasi adalah analisis efektivitas kegiatan yang akhirnya akan mendorong suatu penilaian tentang kemajuan yang dibuat sehubungan dengan tujuan dari suatu perusahaan. Ini adalah perbedaan utama antara monitoring dan evaluasi.
Monitoring memantau terus-menerus jalannya implementasi. Dalam kegiatan ini diperiksa kemajuan yang dibuat dalam proyek terhadap waktu dengan mempertimbangkan performa yang mudah diidentifikasi. Evaluasi di sisi lain mengestimasi nilai dari sesuatu. Ini melibatkan proses pencarian fakta.
Evaluasi juga dapat dijelaskan sebagai studi tentang pengalaman masa lalu ketika datang ke kinerja dan pelaksanaan proyek. Pemantauan tidak memperhitungkan pengalaman masa lalu yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan proyek. Secara singkat dapat dikatakan bahwa evaluasi bertujuan penyampaian informasi yang berlaku pada pelaksanaan dan dampak dari proyek tersebut.
Evaluasi membuat sebuah studi tentang efektivitas proyek. Seementara, monitoring melakukan pemantauan atau pemeriksaan berkala kemajuan yang telah dicapai dalam pelaksanaan proyek terhadap sasaran dan tujuan yang ditetapkan. Jadi, pemantauan dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk memastikan penyelesaian proyek dalam waktu yang sudah ditetapkan. Ini sebenarnya adalah tujuan dari pemantauan.
Tujuan monitoring juga terletak dalam memberikan saran konstruktif. Saran-saran ini bisa mengenai penjadwalan proyek jika diperlukan, penjatahan anggaran yang terpisah untuk proyek dan bahkan pemindahan staf untuk melakukan suatu proyek tertentu.
Di sisi lain, tujuan evaluasi adalah membawa proses akuntansi yang dekat dengan sempurna. Hal ini juga berkaitan bagaimana membuat sebaik mungkin menggunakan dana yang tersedia, metode untuk menghentikan kemungkinan kesalahan, menguji efektivitas teknik-teknik baru yang digunakan dalam penyelesaian proyek, verifikasi manfaat nyata dari proyek-proyek dan pemahaman partisipasi orang dalam proyek dengan cara survei, wawancara dan sejenisnya. Memang benar, evaluasi bertujuan untuk masa depan. *****
Monitoring and Evaluation are two states of analysis in terms of the progress made in relation to the goals of an enterprise or a firm. These two states of analysis differ in their manner of approach. Monitoring is the systematic analysis made occasionally of information to identify changes over a period of time.
On the other hand evaluation is the analysis of the effectiveness of an activity that would finally prompt a judgment regarding the progress made in relation to the goals of a firm. This is the major difference between monitoring and evaluation. Monitoring keeps the track of the process of implementation. It consists in examining the progress made in a project against time by taking into account performance too. Evaluation on the other hand consists in estimating the value of something. It involves the process of finding the facts.
Evaluation can also be explained as the study of past experience when it comes to the performance and implementation of the project. Monitoring does not take into account the past experience involved in the performance of a project. In short it can be said that evaluation aims at the submission of the valid information on the conduct and impact of the project.
Evaluation consists in making a study about the effectiveness of the projects. On the other hand monitoring consists in periodical checking of progress made in the conduct of the projects against the targets and goals laid down. It has to be understood that monitoring is done with a view to ensure the completion of the project in time. This in fact is the very purpose of monitoring.
The purpose of monitoring also lies in providing constructive suggestions. These suggestions can be regarding the rescheduling of the project if required, allotment of separate budget to the project and even reassigning the staff for the conduct of a particular project.
On the other hand the purpose of evaluation lies in bringing about the process of accounting close to perfection. It also consists in making the best possible use of the available funds, methods to stop the probability of mistakes, testing the efficacy of the new techniques employed in the completion of the projects, verifying the real benefits of the projects and understanding the participation of the people in the project by means of surveys, interviews and the like. It is true that evaluation aims for the future
sumber:
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-monitoring-and-vs-evaluation/
Read more: http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-monitoring-and-vs-evaluation/#ixzz1NEkZwMrs
Monitoring vs Evaluasi
Monitoring dan Evaluasi adalah dua bentuk analisis dalam hal kemajuan. Ini dibuat sehubungan dengan tujuan suatu perusahaan atau kegiatan. Kedua analisis ini berbeda dalam cara mereka mendekati objek atau masalah. Monitoring adalah analisis sistematis yang dijalankan secara reguler untuk mengidentifikasi perubahan selama jangka waktu tertentu.
Di sisi lain evaluasi adalah analisis efektivitas kegiatan yang akhirnya akan mendorong suatu penilaian tentang kemajuan yang dibuat sehubungan dengan tujuan dari suatu perusahaan. Ini adalah perbedaan utama antara monitoring dan evaluasi.
Monitoring memantau terus-menerus jalannya implementasi. Dalam kegiatan ini diperiksa kemajuan yang dibuat dalam proyek terhadap waktu dengan mempertimbangkan performa yang mudah diidentifikasi. Evaluasi di sisi lain mengestimasi nilai dari sesuatu. Ini melibatkan proses pencarian fakta.
Evaluasi juga dapat dijelaskan sebagai studi tentang pengalaman masa lalu ketika datang ke kinerja dan pelaksanaan proyek. Pemantauan tidak memperhitungkan pengalaman masa lalu yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan proyek. Secara singkat dapat dikatakan bahwa evaluasi bertujuan penyampaian informasi yang berlaku pada pelaksanaan dan dampak dari proyek tersebut.
Evaluasi membuat sebuah studi tentang efektivitas proyek. Seementara, monitoring melakukan pemantauan atau pemeriksaan berkala kemajuan yang telah dicapai dalam pelaksanaan proyek terhadap sasaran dan tujuan yang ditetapkan. Jadi, pemantauan dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk memastikan penyelesaian proyek dalam waktu yang sudah ditetapkan. Ini sebenarnya adalah tujuan dari pemantauan.
Tujuan monitoring juga terletak dalam memberikan saran konstruktif. Saran-saran ini bisa mengenai penjadwalan proyek jika diperlukan, penjatahan anggaran yang terpisah untuk proyek dan bahkan pemindahan staf untuk melakukan suatu proyek tertentu.
Di sisi lain, tujuan evaluasi adalah membawa proses akuntansi yang dekat dengan sempurna. Hal ini juga berkaitan bagaimana membuat sebaik mungkin menggunakan dana yang tersedia, metode untuk menghentikan kemungkinan kesalahan, menguji efektivitas teknik-teknik baru yang digunakan dalam penyelesaian proyek, verifikasi manfaat nyata dari proyek-proyek dan pemahaman partisipasi orang dalam proyek dengan cara survei, wawancara dan sejenisnya. Memang benar, evaluasi bertujuan untuk masa depan. *****
Masyarakat komunitas vs masyarakat pasar
Berbagai perbedaan antara “masyarakat komunitas” yang dicirikan oleh kelembagaan komunitasnya yang kuat dengan “masyarakat pasar” yang ruhnya didominasi kelembagaan pasar, dinarasikan secara diametral pada tabel berikut:
Komunitas vs negara vs pasar
Antara komunitas, negara, pasar memiliki perbedaan yang hakiki. Perbedaan secara umum antara mereka dijabarkan pada tabel berikut.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)